Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890322›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in reproductive health2026

From anticipatory fear to relational trust: women's experiences of gynecological examination in Turkey: a qualitative study.

Çiğdem Can Bayrak, Ayse Sezer Balci

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Çiğdem Can BayrakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bucak State Hospital, Burdur, Türkiye.
Ayse Sezer BalciDepartment of Public Health Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While fear, embarrassment, and sociocultural barriers associated with gynecological examinations are well documented, existing literature has predominantly focused on their prevalence and consequences, with limited attention to the dynamic processes through which these meanings are constructed and transformed within the clinical encounter. Aim: This study aimed to explore how women construct, experience, and reinterpret gynecological examinations and to examine how communication and interpersonal interactions shape the negotiation of fear and trust during the clinical encounter. Methods: This qualitative study adopted a qualitative descriptive design informed by a social constructionist perspective. Twenty women who had undergone vaginal speculum examination in the outpatient gynecology clinic of a public hospital in Burdur, Turkey, were recruited using purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted immediately after the examination and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke's approach. Results: Four overarching themes and six interrelated subthemes were identified: (1) Constructing Fear Before the Examination, (2) Negotiating Embarrassment and Bodily Exposure, (3) Communication and the Development of Relational Trust, and (4) Reinterpreting the Examination Experience. Across these themes, anticipatory fear was often shaped by socially transmitted narratives and uncertainty, whereas communication and relational trust facilitated the reinterpretation of the examination as less distressing than anticipated. Conclusion: Gynecological examination should be understood not only as an invasive clinical procedure but also as a socially and relationally mediated experience. Strengthening patient-centered communication and privacy-sensitive care may improve women's engagement with gynecological services.

Indexed as

feargynecological examinationhealth communicationqualitative researchtrust

Identifiers

PMID42890322
PMCPMC13671307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.