ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Comparative genomic analysis of
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Staphylococci are a diverse group of bacteria commonly found on the skin and mucosal surfaces of humans and animals. Members of the genus can transition from commensalism to opportunistic pathogenicity. The extent to which close contact facilitates transmission of staphylococci remains misunderstood, particularly at the genomic level. In this context, the present study aimed to investigate the possible transmission of Materials and methods: For this, we used a comparative genomics framework to investigate genomic relatedness, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence gene profiles. A total of 27 bacterial isolates were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing, obtained from thirteen dog-owner pairs selected from a previous study involving 50 dogs and 34 owners, in which the same Staphylococcus spp. was identified in both hosts. The isolates were initially identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF), followed by analyses of resistance and virulence genes, molecular typing, and genomic similarity. Results and discussion: The resistome analysis revealed the presence of clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance determinants. Virulence profiling identified genes associated with host colonization and persistence. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) revealed high levels of similarity in several dog- owner pairs (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.