Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890309›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Effects of artificial milk on growth performance and intestinal barrier function in suckling piglets: a review.

Guangyao Song, Jingrong Feng, Han Yuan, Huijin Jia, Wanghong Zhang, Sumei Zhao, Junhong Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guangyao Song *Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Jingrong Feng *Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Han YuanYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Huijin JiaYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Wanghong ZhangYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Sumei ZhaoYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.
Junhong ZhuYunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed, Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous improvement of genetic selection in modern swine production, litter size has steadily increased. However, due to the limited capacity of sows to enhance milk production, some piglets experience insufficient milk intake and restricted growth during the lactation period. As an important supplement to sow milk, artificial milk has been widely used in both production practice and scientific research. This review summarizes the effects of artificial milk on the growth performance and intestinal health of suckling piglets. It analyzes how insufficient milk yield and the nutritional composition of sow milk affect piglet growth, and then discusses the positive roles of artificial milk in alleviating the lactational burden on sows, mitigating environmental stress, and improving weaning weight and survival rate of piglets. Furthermore, the potential mechanisms by which artificial milk promotes intestinal development and enhances growth performance are examined from the perspectives of intestinal morphology, digestive function, and the mechanical, mucus, microbial, and immune barriers of the gut. This review aims to provide a theoretical basis for the management of piglets born to sows with extremely large litters.

Indexed as

artificial milkgrowth performanceintestinal barrier functionintestinal healthsuckling piglet

Identifiers

PMID42890309
PMCPMC13671360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.