ArticleFrontiers in neurorobotics2026
Uncertainty-aware posture quality assessment with Bayesian liquid neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in neurorobotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated posture quality assessment has become increasingly important in health and wellness technology. However, existing methods predominantly provide point estimates without quantifying prediction confidence, posing a critical limitation in safety-sensitive applications where incorrect assessments may lead to improper guidance. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a reliability-oriented evaluation framework based on Bayesian Liquid Neural Networks (LNNBI). Unlike conventional approaches, our method simultaneously delivers a quality score and a principled uncertainty measure derived from Bayesian variational inference. More importantly, we incorporate a rejection mechanism that enables the model to abstain from making predictions when uncertainty exceeds a predefined threshold, establishing a built-in safeguard for practical deployment. To support this framework, we construct a longitudinal dataset comprising 50 participants over 200 sessions, decomposing four fundamental human postures into seven biomechanical indicators. Experimental results demonstrate that LNNBI achieves 0.8715 accuracy and 0.9105 precision, outperforming LSTM, MC-GRU, TSGCN, and YoNet baselines. Uncertainty analysis reveals a strong correlation between prediction error and uncertainty (Pearson's
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.