ArticleCureus2026
Demographic Factors Influencing the Need for Repeat Radiofrequency Ablation in Chronic Pain Management: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a common noninvasive intervention for chronic pain management; however, the large variability in patient response underscores the need to better understand factors impacting treatment and patient outcomes. This study investigated whether demographic variables, specifically race, sex, age, and body mass index (BMI), are associated with the frequency of repeat RFA procedures in patients with chronic pain.
methodsThis retrospective case series study was conducted at a single outpatient academic pain management clinic. A total of 170 clinic patients (mean age: 58.8 years; mean BMI: 31.5) who underwent at least two radiofrequency ablation (RFA) procedures between January 2019 and January 2023 were included. All patients had complete demographic and procedural data and at least one follow-up visit after their initial RFA; patients with incomplete or missing records or no follow-up visits were excluded. The primary outcome measure was the number of RFA procedures per patient.
resultsOne-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the number of repeat RFA procedures across racial groups (F(4,165) = 0.58, p = 0.68) or between genders (F(1,168) = 1.85, p = 0.18). Linear regression analysis found no statistically significant associations between number of repeat RFA procedures and age (F(1,168) = 3.06, p = 0.08) or BMI (F(1,166) = 0.00, p = 0.95). Ordered logistic regression further illustrated that the demographic variables examined - race, sex, age, BMI - were not associated with the number of repeat RFA procedures (χ²(4) = 5.53, p = 0.24). Conclusions: Overall, our results showed that demographics including sex, race, age, and BMI were not associated with the frequency of RFA procedures in chronic pain management. Other variables like procedural variance, social support, or other comorbidities may serve as better potential determinants for treatment response and pain outcomes. These findings suggest that demographic variables alone may not explain variability in repeat RFA utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.