ArticleJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2027
"The box" allograft augmentation for at risk rotator cuff repairs.
Article in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotator cuff tears are a challenging problem for orthopedic surgeons, especially those with at risk features. Because of this it is imperative to establish reliable methods to maximize patient outcomes and mitigate the risk of retears. Biologic augmentation with dermal allograft augmentation (DAA) has been proposed to improve tendon healing and structural integrity. This study describes a novel arthroscopic technique using DAA augmentation with a box-configuration transosseous-equivalent canopy construct and reports early clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) with DAA augmentation using a box-configuration construct between January 2021 and October 2025 by 2 surgeons at a single institution. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated to classify tear size, tissue quality, and tendon retraction. Clinical outcomes assessed included post-operative pain, range of motion, retear rate, and complications. Results: Eleven patients underwent RCR with DAA augmentation. Mean age was 59.5 years (range, 51-72) with a mean body mass index of 27.6. Seven repairs (63.6%) were revision procedures. Ten tears (90.9%) were full thickness, with a median of 2 tendons involved and a median Patte retraction grade of 2. Mean follow-up was 7.2 months. Post-operatively, ROM remained excellent in 5 patients (45.5%) and improved in 6 patients (54.5%). Pain improved completely in 9 patients (81.8%) and partially in 2 (18.2%). No post-operative infections were observed or reoperations. Conclusion: Arthroscopic RCR with DAA augmentation using a box-configuration canopy construct demonstrated favorable early clinical outcomes and a low complication rate in a cohort with a high proportion of revision repairs. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up are needed to further evaluate the durability and clinical benefits of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.