ReviewFrontiers in neural circuits2026
Beyond heartbeats: re-thinking interoception in autism through virtual reality and computational modelling.
Review in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interoception, the sensing and interpretation of internal bodily signals, is increasingly invoked to explain heterogeneity in autism, yet empirical findings remain inconsistent. A major reason is methodological: the field remains cardio-centric and relies heavily on heartbeat counting tasks and trait questionnaires, which are vulnerable to cognitive strategies, attention, expectancy effects, and confounds such as alexithymia and anxiety. Autism research further indicates that interoception is multidimensional (accuracy, sensibility, metacognitive awareness) and developmentally dynamic, with evidence for dissociations across components and compensation across the lifespan. We argue that progress requires reframing interoception as an inference problem: the brain estimates hidden physiological states from noisy sensory evidence under context-dependent precision weighting (predictive processing/active inference). Building on this framework, we propose a participatory, multimodal research program for autism that integrates (i) lived experience as hypothesis-shaping data, (ii) virtual reality (VR) as an experimental testbed to manipulate embodiment, sensory load, agency cues, and feedback, and (iii) computational physiological modelling to estimate latent cardiovascular-respiratory and autonomic-control parameters, which could subsequently constrain separately specified models of perceptual inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.