Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890192›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging2026

Opportunities to enhance assisted living facility care quality through interprofessional collaborative practice.

David Hage, Rekha Pudur, Jan Golembiski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David HageDepartment of Social Work, Shady Rest Institute on Positive Aging, Marieb College of Health and Human Services, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, United States.
Rekha PudurDepartment of Health Sciences, Shady Rest Institute on Positive Aging, Marieb College of Health and Human Services, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, United States.
Jan GolembiskiDepartment of Social Work, Marieb College of Health and Human Services, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interprofessional Education (IPE) is increasingly recognized as a vital strategy for enhancing the quality of care in assisted living facility (ALF) settings. By fostering collaboration among healthcare professionals such as nurses, nurses' aides, social workers, physicians, and administrators, IPE promotes a shared and more robust understanding of resident needs and care goals. This opinion article argues that greater integration of IPE and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) into long-term care training programs can significantly improve communication, reduce errors, and enhance person-centered care. Assisted living communities face complex challenges, including managing chronic conditions, supporting cognitive issues, changes in resident acuity, and addressing psychosocial needs. IPCP equips staff with the skills to navigate these challenges collectively, leading to more coordinated and effective care. While barriers such as scheduling challenges and institutional silos frequently persist, the potential benefits of IPCP include broader integration of IPCP towards improved resident outcomes, resident and staff satisfaction, and operational efficiencies that warrant its broader adoption. This article calls for greater prioritization of IPCP in assisted living facility settings to enhance resident outcomes and staff collaboration.

Indexed as

assisted livingIPCP inter-professional collaborative practiceIPElongterm carequality improvement

Identifiers

PMID42890192
PMCPMC13672528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.