Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890162›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Dynamic changes in gut microbiota of three breeds of stud boars pre- and post-amoxicillin administration.

Liusheng Wang, Huiting He, Tao Huang, Zhelong Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liusheng WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.
Huiting HeKey Laboratory of Applied Technology on Green-Eco-Healthy Animal Husbandry of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Tao HuangKey Laboratory of Applied Technology on Green-Eco-Healthy Animal Husbandry of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Science and Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhelong JiangDepartment of Emergency, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Amoxicillin is a commonly used broad-spectrum antibiotic in pig farming, valued for its cost-effectiveness and efficacy in addressing prevalent swine ailments. However, the specific effects on the gut microbiota of stud boars and the trajectory of microbial recovery post-antibiotic withdrawal remain insufficiently elucidated. Method: This study aimed to investigate the dynamic trajectory of gut microbiota in 40 Large White (LW), 47 Landrace (LAN), and 16 Duroc (DUR) stud boars before (D0), during (D7), and after (D14) amoxicillin administration (100 mg/kg of feed from D3 to D7) using 16S rRNA sequencing. Results: Amoxicillin significantly reduced alpha diversity (measured by observed species and the Shannon index) in LW and LAN stud boars at D7, with partial recovery by D14. In contrast, DUR stud boars showed no significant changes in diversity. Principal coordinate analysis revealed distinct microbial community structures across different time points, with samples from D7 forming a separate cluster, distinct from those collected on D0 and D14. At the genus level, Conclusion: Taken together, this study aids in optimizing antibiotic use in pig farming, reducing resistance risks, and promoting sustainable animal health.

Indexed as

16S rRNAamoxicillinboarsdynamic trajectoryfecal microbiota

Identifiers

PMID42890162
PMCPMC13671024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.