Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890145›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2026

Changes in Midrange and End Range Adjacent Segment Motion 3 Years After One- Or Two-Level Cervical Arthrodesis.

Clarissa M LeVasseur, Samuel W Pitcairn, Xinyi Dan, Yan Ma, David O Okonkwo, Jeremy D Shaw, William F Donaldson, Joon Y Lee, William J Anderst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Clarissa M LeVasseurDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7552-1765
Samuel W PitcairnDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Xinyi DanDepartment of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Yan MaDepartment of Biostatistics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2118-0392
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurosurgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Jeremy D ShawDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
William F DonaldsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.
Joon Y LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-0561
William J AnderstDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0535-0953

Funding

Mechanisms Affecting the Natural History of Cervical Spine Degeneration after ArthrodesisR01AR069543 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI William J. Anderst · 2016 to 2026
$2.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR069543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biomechanical cadaver studies consistently find that cervical arthrodesis leads to increased motion adjacent to the arthrodesis. However, in vivo evidence indicates adjacent segment end range motion does not reliably increase at 1 year after one-level or two-level cervical arthrodesis. Because changes beyond 1 year remain unknown, this study assessed the effects of one- and two-level cervical arthrodesis on adjacent segment motion 3 years after arthrodesis. Methods: Sixty-two patients were tested preoperatively (PRE), 1 year postoperatively (1YR-POST), and 3 years postoperatively (3YR-POST) along with 22 asymptomatic controls, who were tested once. A validated CT model-based tracking technique was used to measure three-dimensional (3D) vertebral motion from biplane radiographs acquired during dynamic flexion-extension and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Adjacent segment intervertebral end range of motion (ROM) and midrange ROM (i.e. Results: End range adjacent segment motion tended to increase over time after arthrodesis; however, significant increases were found only after two-level arthrodesis. In contrast, midrange adjacent segment motion increased significantly after one- and two-level arthrodesis and was greater than in corresponding motion segments in controls. Conclusions: Midrange adjacent segment motion may be better than end range motion for detecting early mechanical changes after cervical arthrodesis that could contribute to adjacent segment degeneration. In vivo changes in adjacent segment motion are inconsistent across patients up to 3 years after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Identifiers

PMID42890145
PMCPMC13671002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.