ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2026
A proposal for the classification of early complications during percutaneous central venous access: previous note.
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central venous access is a common hospital procedure that plays an essential role in many clinical situations. Despite its widespread use, there is no standardized classification for early complications, which limits systematic analysis and development of health indicators. This study aimed to propose an objective and applicable classification for early complications of central venous access, encompassing events related to puncture and catheter positioning. This was a longitudinal observational study conducted at the Universidade Federal do Piauí teaching hospital (HU-UFPI) from October 2024 to April 2025, enrolling patients undergoing central venous access placement by the Clinical Surgery Unit team. Clinical and procedural variables were assessed, including ultrasound guidance, puncture site, catheter positioning, and post-procedure complications. The proposed classification groups complications into five categories: I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB. In the sample (n = 35), 85.7% of observed complications were classified as category I, 11.4% as IIA, and 2,9% as IIB, with no major complications observed. The proposed classification appears to be potentially useful for standardizing the description of early complications, although the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size, absence of major complications, and single-center design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.