Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890142›Full record

ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2026

A proposal for the classification of early complications during percutaneous central venous access: previous note.

José da Cruz Moura Campêlo, Luís Gustavo Cavalcante Reinaldo, Alexandre da Costa Machado Matos Terceiro, Ocilio Ribeiro Gonçalves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

José da Cruz Moura CampêloUniversidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, PI, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9371-0129
Luís Gustavo Cavalcante ReinaldoUniversidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, PI, Brasil.
Alexandre da Costa Machado Matos TerceiroUniversidade Federal do Norte do Tocantins - UFNT, Araguaína, TO, Brasil.
Ocilio Ribeiro GonçalvesUniversidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Teresina, PI, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central venous access is a common hospital procedure that plays an essential role in many clinical situations. Despite its widespread use, there is no standardized classification for early complications, which limits systematic analysis and development of health indicators. This study aimed to propose an objective and applicable classification for early complications of central venous access, encompassing events related to puncture and catheter positioning. This was a longitudinal observational study conducted at the Universidade Federal do Piauí teaching hospital (HU-UFPI) from October 2024 to April 2025, enrolling patients undergoing central venous access placement by the Clinical Surgery Unit team. Clinical and procedural variables were assessed, including ultrasound guidance, puncture site, catheter positioning, and post-procedure complications. The proposed classification groups complications into five categories: I, IIA, IIB, IIIA, and IIIB. In the sample (n = 35), 85.7% of observed complications were classified as category I, 11.4% as IIA, and 2,9% as IIB, with no major complications observed. The proposed classification appears to be potentially useful for standardizing the description of early complications, although the findings should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size, absence of major complications, and single-center design.

Indexed as

central venous catheterizationclassificationcomplicationspatient safety

Identifiers

PMID42890142
PMCPMC13671018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.