ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Targeting the gut microbiota to promote motor rehabilitation after spinal cord injury: mechanisms, evidence, and translational challenges.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating central nervous system trauma that frequently results in permanent motor dysfunction. Over the past decade the gut microbiota has emerged as a potentially modifiable contributor to secondary injury and neural repair, giving rise to the concept of the gut-spinal cord axis. In this narrative review we synthesize current understanding of how SCI-associated gut dysbiosis may relate to the recovery of motor function, focusing on immune modulation, microbial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids and bile acids, and gut-central nervous system signaling. Throughout, we deliberately separate evidence obtained in SCI models or in people with SCI from mechanistic evidence generated in other diseases or experimental systems, because conflating these sources is a recurring source of over-interpretation in this field. We then summarize microbiota-targeted interventions studied in animal models-probiotics and prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), antibiotics and bacteriophages, and direct supplementation with microbial metabolites-and appraise the small, predominantly observational human literature. Several of these interventions improve locomotor outcomes in rodent SCI models, but, with rare exceptions, the causal chain from a microbial change to a functional improvement has not been demonstrated within a single SCI study, and no randomized controlled trial in people with SCI has used motor function as its primary endpoint. We conclude by dissecting the principal translational barriers-inter-individual variability in microbiota composition, uncertain intervention timing and duration, unresolved safety questions, and the absence of standardized pre-clinical-to-clinical pipelines-and by outlining the study designs and reporting standards required to move this field from association toward causation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.