ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2026
Topical oxybutynin antiperspirant for axillary hyperhidrosis: a phase IIb PROBE design clinical trial (TODAY trial).
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary hyperhidrosis is a chronic condition with limited therapeutic options. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of 10% oxybutynin spray on axillary hyperhidrosis, considering both its local and systemic effects, in terms of Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) outcomes for hyperhidrosis of the axilla and eight additional sites. Methods: Prospective phase II PROBE design trial. Adult patients with axillary hyperhidrosis were randomized to receive a 10% oxybutynin topical spray, oral oxybutynin, or placebo spray for 35 days. Efficacy was evaluated on day 35 using the HDSS and a hyperhidrosis-specific quality-of-life (QoL) assessment questionnaire. Results: 17 patients were randomized. No significant differences were observed in HDSS outcomes from baseline to day 35 in any of the three groups (2.5 [2 - 4], 4 [3 - 4], 3.5 [3 - 4], p= 0.207), although a trend to improvement was noted in both treatment groups. Significant improvement in the QoL questionnaire was observed from baseline to day 35 in the oxybutynin spray group (pre-intervention QoL: 78.5 [70 - 96] and post-intervention QoL: 38.5 [32 - 67], p = 0.031). Conclusions: No differences were observed in the primary outcome. A significant improvement from baseline to day 35 was observed in the QoL questionnaire score for the oxybutynin spray group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.