Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890123›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026

Sex-specific hormone signatures in four fish species with divergent reproductive strategies.

Freya Adele Pappert, Olivia Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Freya Adele PappertMarine Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Olivia RothMarine Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Steroid hormones regulate diverse biological processes, including development, immunity and reproduction. Because biological sex, pregnancy, parental care, and mate competition are closely associated in most established model organisms, it remains unclear whether endocrine differences between males and females are primarily linked to gametic sex or to the reproductive roles performed by each sex. Syngnathid fish, the pipefishes, seadragons, and seahorses, provide a powerful system for disentangling these effects, because males, rather than females, carry the developing embryos. Species further differ in sexual selection and in the extent of paternal investment, ranging from externally attached eggs to incubation with an enclosed brood pouch. Methods: This study provides baseline hormonal profiles of key steroid and peptide hormones in three syngnathid species across the unique evolutionary parental care gradient of male pregnancy ( Results: Sex-specific endocrine profiles broadly followed sexual selection differentials: species with stronger sexual heteromorphism, i.e., more extreme reproductive roles ( Discussion: By incorporating a cross-species comparative framework with both sex-role reversed and a conventional viviparous species, we can begin to understand which hormonal functions are conserved versus derived, and whether endocrine profiles are primarily aligned with biological sex or reproductive role, such as mate competition and parental care, thereby revealing how endocrine constraints and plasticity contribute to reproductive evolution.

Indexed as

FishesGonadal Steroid HormonesReproductionAnimalsFemaleMaleSex CharacteristicsSmegmamorphaSpecies SpecificityGonadal Steroid Hormonesendocrinologymale pregnancysex-rolessteroid hormonessyngnathid

Identifiers

PMID42890123
PMCPMC13672188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.