ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Prognostic value of APOC1 in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with high short-term mortality. Valid prognostic biomarkers are required to refine risk stratification and improve clinical management. This study aimed to identify potential prognostic biomarkers for predicting clinical outcomes in ACLF patients. Methods: Seventy-four ACLF patients admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between January 2021 and April 2022 were enrolled for retrospective analysis of baseline characteristics, clinical parameters and clinical outcomes. Forty patients were randomly selected for data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry (DIA-MS)-based proteomic profiling and differential protein analysis, and categorized into survival (n = 20) and non-survival (n = 20) groups according to 90-day outcomes. Bioinformatics analyses were performed to characterize candidate targets. Apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) levels were validated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate its prognostic performance and compare it with a newly established model, conventional biomarkers and existing scoring systems. Single-cell RNA sequencing was applied to determine the cellular source and distribution of APOC1, and molecular docking was performed to screen potential APOC1-targeted therapeutic agents. Results: Proteomic analysis identified 41 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Protein-protein interaction network analysis revealed that APOC1 occupied a core hub position in the network. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that DEPs were mainly involved in lipid metabolism, lipoprotein clearance and cholesterol efflux. ELISA confirmed significantly higher plasma APOC1 levels in the survival group, suggesting a protective role. Comparative ROC analysis demonstrated favorable prognostic performance of APOC1. Incorporation of APOC1 into traditional scoring systems moderately improved predictive efficacy. Single-cell RNA sequencing further revealed that APOC1 was predominantly expressed in hepatic macrophages. Molecular docking showed strong binding affinities of APOC1 with saikosaponin D and resveratrol, with binding energies of -7.8 and -6.7 kcal/mol, respectively. Elevated plasma APOC1 was positively correlated with survival in ACLF patients. Conclusion: Plasma APOC1 serves as a novel prognostic biomarker for ACLF. Integrating APOC1 into conventional scoring systems yields complementary prognostic value. Hepatic macrophages represent the primary cellular source of APOC1, and saikosaponin D and resveratrol are promising candidate agents targeting APOC1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.