ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Pathological microbial niches in diabetic foot ulcers: a host-microbe framework for impaired repair and niche-based stratification.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are commonly described through the clinical triad of hyperglycaemia, ischaemia and infection. That language is useful for bedside decision-making, but it does not fully explain why some wounds remain inflamed and open despite debridement, offloading, antimicrobial therapy, vascular assessment and modern wound care. Here we develop a conceptual review framework in which many non-healing DFUs are interpreted as pathological microbial niches: local tissue regions where microbial persistence and host repair failure reinforce each other. Hyperglycaemia, impaired perfusion, hypoxia, neuropathic pressure injury, necrotic material and extracellular matrix degradation generate ecological space for microbial survival. Microbial products, biofilm-like spatial organisation, strain-level traits, fungi and polymicrobial interactions then amplify neutrophil extracellular traps, inflammasome signalling, protease release, fibroblast dysfunction, endothelial impairment and defective re-epithelialisation. The result is not a linear sequence from colonisation to infection to inflammation, but a self-reinforcing loop in which microbial adaptation and host non-healing programs become difficult to separate. We summarise evidence from chronic wound microbiome studies, biofilm histology, strain-level and fungal analyses, host transcriptomics, single-cell data and emerging spatial omics, while emphasising the boundaries of each evidence type. The central question is not whether microbes can be detected in DFU tissue, but whether they are viable, metabolically active, spatially organised and positioned close enough to host cells to alter repair behaviour. We propose an operational definition of the pathological microbial niche and a translational scheme for biofilm-dominant, ischaemia-dominant, protease-dominant, senescence-dominant and immune-resolution-failure wound patterns. This framing may help move DFU microbiome research from descriptive association toward mechanism-based stratification and more rational combinations of source control, vascular optimisation, antimicrobial therapy and repair-directed treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.