ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Clinical correlation of hemodynamic parameters using blood flow prediction model in cerebrovascular arteries.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient-specific hemodynamic assessment is pivotal for optimizing treatment strategies in cerebrovascular interventions; however, conventional modalities are often limited by restricted clinical accessibility or prolonged acquisition times. Methods: This study evaluates the previously developed Dr. NEAR flow (DNF), a streamlined computational framework designed for rapid and clinically feasible blood flow prediction, validated against Non-invasive Optimal Vessel Analysis (NOVA), a quantitative magnetic resonance angiography technique. The DNF methodology reconstructs a one-dimensional vascular topology from standard time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA-TOF) sequences, and flow rate, velocity, and relative pressure are computed throughout the reconstructed vascular network using a Poiseuille-based fluid model. For validation, patient-specific boundary conditions were parameterized using proximal inflow measurements obtained from NOVA, and quantitative comparisons were performed at arterial locations with corresponding NOVA measurements. Results: Across 230 arterial segments in 35 subjects, NOVA-measured and DNF-predicted flow rates were strongly correlated ( Discussion: These findings indicate that DNF is a feasible approach for cerebrovascular hemodynamic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.