Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42890073›Full record

ReviewACS omega2026

Emerging Polysaccharide-Based Biomaterials in 3D Bioprinting: Materials, Biomedical Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Menaga S, Sushma Kumari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Menaga SCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.
Sushma KumariCentre for Biomaterials, Cellular and Molecular Theranostics, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5779-812X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contemporary healthcare systems require advanced, sustainable, and patient-specific therapeutic solutions. We need advanced technologies, exemplified by 3D printing and biomaterials such as carbohydrates, to produce many 3D-bioprinted in vitro tissues and organ models for drug testing and regenerative medicine. In recent years, polysaccharide-based biomaterials have emerged as promising candidates for three-dimensional (3D) printing applications owing to their intrinsic biocompatibility, biodegradability, tunable physicochemical properties, and structural resemblance to native extracellular matrices (ECMs). In addition, recent progress in biomaterial modification and 3D printing methodologies has broadened their biomedical applications, particularly in tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, organ model development for drug discovery, and in situ bioprinting. This review presents a comprehensive overview of widely utilized polysaccharides in regenerative medicine, 3D printing techniques, bioink formulations, and the biomedical applications of 3D systems. It highlights recent advancements in material design, fabrication strategies, and biological performance and addresses current challenges and future perspectives for translating these materials from laboratory research to clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID42890073
PMCPMC13670873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.