ReviewACS omega2026
Metal-Organic Frameworks as Tunable Sorbents for Food Sample Preparation.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trace-level chemical contamination across globalized food supply chains demands efficient, selective, and sustainable sample preparation strategies for reliable analytical monitoring. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are crystalline porous materials constructed from metal nodes and multitopic organic linkers that have recently emerged as engineered sorbents capable of complementing conventional extraction media, particularly in terms of selectivity, surface area, and compatibility with green analytical chemistry principles. This review critically examines the deployment of MOFs and MOF-based composites as sorbents across the full spectrum of food sample preparation formats, including solid-phase extraction (SPE), magnetic SPE (MSPE), dispersive SPE (d-SPE), miniaturized variants (pipette-tip SPE, d-μ-SPE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), and QuEChERS-based cleanup. Distinct from prior overviews focused primarily on materials chemistry, this review adopts a food-analysis perspective with an explicit translational lens, distinguishing analytically mature applications from those still at the proof-of-concept stage. The physicochemical properties that govern MOF performance in food matrices, like framework chemistry (Zr, Al, Cr, Zn, Fe, Ln), pore architecture, surface functionality, and hydrolytic stability, are discussed in relation to the predominant extraction mechanisms operative for key contaminant classes, including pesticides, mycotoxins, veterinary drugs, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and heavy metals. Representative applications report recoveries typically within 70-120%, LOQs reaching the ng kg
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.