Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889935›Full record

ArticleBiology methods & protocols2026

Machine learning method for optimizing coding sequences in mammalian cells.

Elias Theodorou, Michael Stadler, Claes Gustafsson, Mark Welch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elias TheodorouATUM, Newark, CA 94560, United States.
Michael StadlerDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
Claes GustafssonATUM, Newark, CA 94560, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2181-3126
Mark WelchATUM, Newark, CA 94560, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian cell lines are the preferred hosts for producing commercially relevant therapeutic proteins such as antibodies, antibody derivatives, and cytokine fusion proteins. Even though significant investment is made to optimize upstream and downstream processes, the optimal gene design parameters for heterologous recombinant protein expression remain poorly understood. We describe a generic approach to gene optimization in which design features are systematically sampled and iteratively modulated using machine learning (ML). Synthetic gene variants encoding the Dasher fluorescent protein, differing only in synonymous codons, were used to interrogate the gene-sequence preferences of transient antibody-expressing HEK293 cells. Synonymous codon variations influenced expression by more than 2 orders of magnitude. This variation in protein yield was used to build ML models relating gene design features, which were then employed to design further-improved genes. The ML models were shown to be expression system-specific. Messenger RNA levels and ribosome occupancy were highly correlated with protein levels, suggesting that mRNA lifetime is influenced by coding bias. Our results illustrate a novel, generally applicable method to improve gene expression via synonymous re-coding for any protein target or host cell.

Indexed as

Design of ExperimentsGene OptimizationHEK293Recombinant Protein ExpressionRibosome OccupancySynonymous Codons

Identifiers

PMID42889935
PMCPMC13671747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.