Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889931›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2026

Contrastive learning and advanced bundle metrics outperform fractional anisotropy for Alzheimer's disease diffusion MRI prediction: findings from the Beyond FA challenge.

Elyssa McMaster, Nancy Newlin, Trent Schwartz, Adam Saunders, Gaurav Rudravaram, Jiheng Li, André Hucke, Yehyun Suh, Jongyeon Yoon, Eleanor Liard and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Elyssa McMasterVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1297-8898
Nancy NewlinVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3714-4684
Trent SchwartzVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1332-5762
Adam SaundersVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2912-9759
Gaurav RudravaramVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Jiheng LiVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0638-1997
André HuckeVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8565-8191
Yehyun SuhVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7037-1104
Jongyeon YoonVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3565-5849
Eleanor LiardUniversité Paris-Panthéon-Assas; Paris, France.
Michael KimVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3562-2688
Chenyu GaoVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-3035
Karthik RamadassVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4610-3860
Chloe ChoVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5114-001X
Sriram Gnana SambanthanIndian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
Tomasz PieciakUniversidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7543-3658
Dominika CiupekSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Kraków, Poland.
Santiago Aja-FernándezUniversidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Antonio Tristán-VegaUniversidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Maciej MalawskiSano Centre for Computational Medicine, Kraków, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6005-0243
Alex CaronUniversité de Sherbrooke; Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Informatics Department, Science Faculty, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-6395
Antoine ThébergUniversité de Sherbrooke; Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Informatics Department, Science Faculty, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-8316
Francois ReaultUniversité de Sherbrooke; Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Informatics Department, Science Faculty, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Arnaud BoréUniversité de Sherbrooke; Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Informatics Department, Science Faculty, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-1211
Manon EddeUniversité de Sherbrooke; Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Laboratory (SCIL), Informatics Department, Science Faculty, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Ji KimCreighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska, United States.
Yihao LiuVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-9903
Lianrui ZuoVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5923-9097
Eleftherios GaryfallidisIndiana University, Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering, Bloomington, Indiana, United States.
Talia NirUniversity of Southern California, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Neda JahanshadUniversity of Southern California, Mark and Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Kurt SchillingVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Daniel MoyerVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5733-2127

Funding

MVP Data Integration into the ADSP Phenotype Harmonization ConsortiumU24AG074855 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CUCCARO, MICHAEL L, HOHMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2021 to 2025
$37.5M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Ultrascale Machine Learning to Empower Discovery in Alzheimers Disease BiobanksU01AG068057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Heng Huang · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Genetic Drivers of Resilience to Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG059716 · NIA · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI HOHMAN, TIMOTHY J · 2018 to 2022
$4.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059716NIA NIH HHS U01 AG068057NIA NIH HHS U24 AG074855NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The inclusion of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in major national studies has allowed for quantification and characterization of white matter macrostructure and microstructure in cases of disease and disorder. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) yields 3D scalar maps to summarize the DW-MRI signal with quantitative metrics. Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a DTI metric that describes the degree of anisotropy within diffusion and is frequently used to interpret white matter integrity, but it exhibits high sensitivity in pathological interpretation. These properties of FA make it difficult to use as a consistent candidate imaging biomarker, as it makes different ages, cognitive statuses, and pathologies difficult to discern. With the development of other white matter models and metrics, such as structural connectivity network measures and tractography bundle analyses, there are many combinations to analyze for white matter integrity analysis, especially in the context of lower-quality clinical data that FA's voxel-wise computation can be sensitive to. The widespread collection of DW-MRI data necessitates an analysis of these metrics to interpret white matter integrity beyond what FA can capture. Approach: We designed a challenge for the medical imaging community to compare crowdsourced DW-MRI candidate imaging biomarkers to a baseline relying on FA in an age, sex, and cognitive status classification task and variables unknown to teams during the challenge. After the challenge submission period ended, we evaluated methods based on sensitivity to environmental variables (humidity and temperature on the day of the scan), and we correlated features with known Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology (amyloid beta 42, tau, and ptau cerebrospinal fluid/CSF readings) to evaluate if the methods collected in this study are robust to the limitations of FA. The key innovations are that we crowdsource DW-MRI feature representations for AD, we develop a framework to compare imaging feature representations in this context, we evaluate the sensitivity of DW-MRI imaging candidate biomarkers to environmental variables, and we correlate the novel features to known AD pathological measures. Results: We find that bundle-based methods outperform whole-brain methods in age classification tasks, but deep learning, computer vision-based methods show a new avenue for cognitive status prediction tasks. Conclusion: The submissions to our challenge show that there are many approaches to consider when developing new AD feature representations.

Indexed as

connectomediffusion MRIfeature extractionharmonizationmicrostructure

Identifiers

PMID42889931
PMCPMC13671859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.