ArticleBiomedical optics express2026
Deep-learning-aided sarcoma biopsy guidance using forward-view endoscopic optical coherence tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sarcoma diagnosis remains challenging due to tumor heterogeneity and the risk of sampling errors during biopsy, as tissue misidentification can result in non-diagnostic outcomes and repeated procedures. This study specifically targets undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and myxofibrosarcoma, imaged in specimens from the human arms and legs. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers high-resolution, real-time microstructural imaging and has shown strong potential for image-guided oncology. In this study, we benchmarked five 2D deep learning models and one custom 3D convolutional neural network (CNN) for normal versus tumor tissues classification using endoscopic OCT. The 2D models were applied to cross-sectional 2D images while the 3D CNN operated on volumetric images, with both evaluated across the Intensity and polarization-sensitive OCT channels (PS-OCT). 3D CNN reached the highest accuracy of 92.67% on Intensity, while PS-OCT channels benefited more from modern 2D architectures and 3D volumetric modeling, with performance gains up to 9.63% for the optic axis. These results demonstrated the feasibility of endoscopic OCT as a real-time, label-free tissue characterization tool during biopsy of these sarcoma tissues. The integration of deep learning with forward-viewing endoscopic OCT offers a promising pathway toward more accurate needle guidance and reduced diagnostic failure rates and established a reproducible benchmarking framework for future OCT-based detection and analysis of sarcoma tissues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.