Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889860›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2026

Pharmacist resource use across the United States: implications for teaching and practice.

Rachel Whitney, Hilary Jasmin, Christopher Alan Giuliano, Audrey Banner Kostrzewa, Melissa Hunter, Christopher S Wisniewski, Emily F Gorman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel Whitneywhitnera@musc.edu, Research & Education Informationist, MUSC Libraries, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Hilary Jasminjasmin@ohsu.edu, Information Specialist, Center for Evidence-based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Christopher Alan Giulianoek2397@wayne.edu, Professor (Clinical), Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Audrey Banner Kostrzewaaudrey.kostrzewa@cuw.edu, Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Concordia University Wisconsin School of Pharmacy, Mequon, WI.
Melissa Huntermhunter2@uwyo.edu, Director, Drug Information Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
Christopher S Wisniewskiwisniews@musc.edu, Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
Emily F Gormanefgorman@hshsl.umaryland.edu, Research and Education Librarian, School of Pharmacy Librarian, Health Sciences and Human Services Library, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1210-1082

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To analyze practicing pharmacists' use of drug information (DI) resources in the United States. Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to practicing US pharmacists through professional organization email lists and social media. The survey questionnaire asked respondents which subscription-based DI resources are provided through their employer, whether they personally pay for additional resources, how often they use subscription-based resources, and other related questions. Results: The survey received 430 responses, 387 of which were able to be fully analyzed. The resources that respondents most frequently had access to through their employer were UpToDate (77.0%), Lexicomp (74.9%), and Micromedex (62.3%). Many respondents (40.8%) paid for subscriptions with personal funds, and 28.9% reported never experiencing access issues due to payment barriers. Respondents in community settings were more likely to have paid for resources with personal funds (57.1%, p<0.05) and have less access to resources (51.4%, p<0.05). In the open-text responses, the most desired resources were point-of-care tools (UpToDate) and DI databases (Lexicomp). Conclusions: US pharmacists experience a varied level of access to DI resources through their employer. Pharmacy educators should focus their instruction on resources that are the most accessible to practicing pharmacists. Many, especially community pharmacists, pay out of pocket for desired resources, presenting an opportunity to advocate for increased resources.

Indexed as

Drug Information ServicesPharmacistsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescollection developmentDrug informationelectronic resourcespharmacy educationpharmacy practice

Identifiers

PMID42889860
PMCPMC13670230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.