ArticleCase reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery2026
Layered PLLA with monopolar RF for facial rejuvenation: a case report.
Article in Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the continuous expansion of facial rejuvenation techniques, the combination of energy-based devices and biostimulatory fillers has become a focal point in clinical research. Monopolar radiofrequency (MRF), such as Thermage, can achieve immediate tissue tightening, while poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), a collagen stimulator, enables volumetric restoration and lifting through progressive collagen regeneration. This article describes a sequential treatment protocol combining MRF followed by layered PLLA injection in three patients with facial laxity and volume loss. Clinical photographs and Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) assessments were collected during follow-up. A split-face approach was applied in Case 1, with combination therapy (MRF + PLLA) administered to the more affected side and MRF alone to the contralateral side. Improvements in facial contour appearance, nasolabial fold severity, and facial symmetry were observed during follow-up. No treatment-related adverse events were reported during the observation period. These cases provide preliminary short-term clinical observations regarding this sequential treatment strategy; however, the contribution of each modality cannot be distinguished and further controlled studies are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.