Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889830›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

"The days are long but the decades are short": subjective aging, life trajectories, and incel identity formation among self-identified older incels.

Linda Coufal, Viivi Korpela

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Linda CoufalInstitute of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
Viivi KorpelaDepartment of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misogynistic radicalization and incel identity formation are often discussed as problems of young men. However, the hub of online misogynistic discourse, the manosphere, has always been aimed at men of all age groups. Research tends to omit older users in the analysis, even though they are active members of extremist communities. This article examines how self-identified older incels narrate their life trajectories and explain the processes through which they came to adopt, maintain, intensify, or question an incel identity. We ask: (1) How do older incels narrate life trajectories to explain how they became and remain incels over time?, and (2) What role do subjective experiences of aging (a process of becoming older) play in incel identity formation? The analysis is based on 19,453 publicly accessible posts from incels.is written by 43 users whose usernames made age, aging, or generational position salient. Through inductive thematic analysis, we show that older incels narrate inceldom not as a sudden ideological shift, but as the cumulative outcome of early exclusion, missed romantic and sexual milestones, social withdrawal, failed self-improvement, and perceived trajectory lock-in. Aging becomes a key meaning-making resource: specific ages are constructed as deadlines, bodily changes as evidence of sexual disqualification, and accumulated time as proof that inceldom has become permanent. However, aging does not produce a single emotional or ideological trajectory. While some forum users express resentment and violent fantasies, others describe exhaustion, numbness, resignation, or ambivalent attempts to advise younger incels. The article contributes to incel and radicalization research by showing how harmful online identities may be sustained and emotionally reorganized across the life course.

Indexed as

age-salienceincelslife trajectoriesmisogynistic extremismmisogynyolder adultssubjective aging

Identifiers

PMID42889830
PMCPMC13670240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.