Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889824›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2026

DIalysis Symptom COntrol-Pruritus Outcome Trial (DISCO-POT): A Multicenter Randomized Blinded Placebo Controlled Crossover Trial.

David Collister, Rocio Ayala Romero, Kathy Cherepak, Navdeep Tangri, Gwen Herrington, Lucy Delgado, Shun Fu Lee, Rachel Girimonte, Thomas Ferguson, Michael Walsh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David CollisterDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Rocio Ayala RomeroDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Kathy CherepakSeven Oaks General Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Canada.
Navdeep TangriSeven Oaks General Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Canada.
Gwen HerringtonCanadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD).
Lucy DelgadoCanadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD).
Shun Fu LeePopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada.
Rachel GirimonteSeven Oaks General Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Canada.
Thomas FergusonSeven Oaks General Hospital Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Canada.
Michael WalshPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: Uremic pruritus affects up to 50% of patients with kidney failure and negatively impacts quality of life. Itch often persists and remains insufficiently controlled despite standard of care treatments. We evaluated the effects of nabilone, a synthetic cannabinoid, in patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis who had symptoms of chronic itch. Study Design: Placebo-controlled randomized crossover trial. Setting & Participants: Adults ≥25 years old receiving maintenance hemodialysis at least twice weekly or peritoneal dialysis daily with at least moderate itch. Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to a first treatment period of either oral nabilone (0.5 mg daily for 1 week then twice a day for 3 weeks) or an identical placebo regimen. After a 2-week washout period, participants received whichever regimen they did not receive in the first treatment period. Outcomes: The primary outcome was the difference in worst visual analog score (0 to 100 mm) for itch over the last 24 hours in each treatment period. Results: Of 14 participants randomized, all were receiving hemodialysis. The worst visual analog score for the nabilone compared to the placebo was 4.88 mm (95% CI, -3.61 to 13.38, Limitations: Underpowered for secondary outcomes and to detect carryover effects, conservative nabilone dosing, short duration and a limited sample. Conclusions: We were unable to detect if nabilone had any effects on uremic pruritus compared with placebo.

Indexed as

Cannabinoidsitchnabiloneuremic pruritus

Identifiers

PMID42889824
PMCPMC13671374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.