ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2026
A suzetrigine-based multimodal analgesic protocol in spine surgery: a single-center retrospective cohort study of opioid consumption, pain, and length of stay.
Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Suzetrigine is an oral selective NaV1.8 inhibitor approved for moderate-to-severe acute pain. We evaluated the addition of this to multimodal analgesia after spine surgery. Methods: This single-center retrospective prepost cohort included 100 adults undergoing spine surgery (50 suzetrigine, 50 controls). The primary endpoint was cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) within 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included MME at postoperative day (POD) 0 and at discharge, pain scores, length of stay (LOS), bowel function, falls, and 30-day readmission. Multivariable models adjusted for age, BMI, baseline pain, chronic opioid use, instrumentation, and race. Results: Race/ethnicity differed between cohorts (p = .032); most other measured baseline characteristics were similar. In the direct 48-hour analysis (44 vs. 43 patients), MME was lower with suzetrigine (median 20.0 vs. 34.0; p = .032; d = -0.45). An all-patient sensitivity analysis using total inpatient MME through discharge for patients discharged before 48 hours was also significant (20.0 vs. 31.8; p = .021). POD0 MME (5.0 vs. 10.0; p = .010) and discharge MME (5.0 vs. 15.0; p = .014) were lower with suzetrigine. LOS did not differ (p = .171). After adjustment, the suzetrigine coefficient for 48-hour MME did not reach significance (β = -9.45; p = .065), and there was no adjusted LOS association (β = -0.43; p = .171). Conclusions: Suzetrigine was associated with lower unadjusted 48-hour, POD0, and discharge opioid consumption, although the adjusted 48-hour association did not reach statistical significance. No LOS difference was observed. Prospective validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.