Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889807›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026

Patient-reported evolution of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool after arthroscopic anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction: A retrospective study of 134 cases.

Ibrahim Saliba, Olivier Grimaud, Vincent Fontanier, Frederic Khiami, Yoann Bohu, Nicolas Lefevre, Alexandre Hardy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ibrahim SalibaOrthopedic Surgery Department Necker hospital Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-157X
Olivier GrimaudOrthopedic Surgery Department Clinique Du Sport Paris France.
Vincent FontanierMedinetic Learning Paris France.
Frederic KhiamiOrthopedic Surgery Department Clinique Du Sport Paris France.
Yoann BohuOrthopedic Surgery Department Clinique Du Sport Paris France.
Nicolas LefevreOrthopedic Surgery Department Clinique Du Sport Paris France.
Alexandre HardyOrthopedic Surgery Department Clinique Du Sport Paris France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the longitudinal evolution of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) after arthroscopic anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction (AALR) and examine associations between CAIT-defined patient-perceived stability, return to sport (RTS) and preoperative factors. Methods: This retrospective single-centre cohort included 134 athletic patients who underwent AALR between January 2019 and January 2023 and had at least 12 months of follow-up. CAIT was assessed preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Patient-perceived stability was defined as CAIT ≥ 24. Repeated continuous and binary outcomes were assessed using paired-data methods. RTS was defined as self-reported resumption of sport by 12 months, irrespective of level. Results: Median CAIT increased from 8 preoperatively to 23, 26 and 28 at 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively (overall Conclusion: Patient-reported ankle function measured by CAIT improved during the first postoperative year after AALR, with the largest change occurring by 6 months. CAIT may complement, but should not replace, objective examination and multidimensional RTS assessment. The identified associations are exploratory and require prospective validation. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Indexed as

anatomic ankle lateral reconstructionarthroscopyCAITchronic lateral ankle instabilitygracilis

Identifiers

PMID42889807
PMCPMC13671355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.