ArticleEuropean journal of midwifery2026
The reasons why Flemish low-risk nulliparous pregnant women choose a specific antenatal care provider: A descriptive qualitative study.
Article in European journal of midwifery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn Belgium, low-risk pregnant women have the option of consulting an obstetrician, midwife, or general practitioner for antenatal care. Although consultations with midwives have increased over the years, obstetricians remain the most frequently consulted providers, even for low-risk pregnancies. However, the reasons behind provider choice remain unclear. The aim of this study was to ascertain the reasons why Flemish low-risk nulliparous pregnant women choose a specific antenatal care provider.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study was carried out in Flanders, Belgium, between March and May 2024, with Flemish low-risk nulliparous pregnant women. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted by a female midwife experienced in qualitative research. An open-ended interview guide was used to explore participants' decision-making processes, experiences with antenatal care providers, expectations of care, and perceived roles of antenatal care providers. Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis was applied to analyze the data in NVivo
resultsThirteen women were interviewed. Their choice of antenatal care provider was shaped by perceptions of medical expertise, accessibility, social influences, and structural constraints. Obstetricians were commonly preferred for their specialization and access to technology, whereas midwives were valued for relational and emotional support once women became aware of their role. Five overarching themes were identified: trust in professional expertise, practical accessibility of care, influence of social environment and informational gaps, need for relational continuity and emotional support, and structural and organizational constraints.
conclusionsThe decision-making process for choosing an antenatal care provider is multidimensional and varies among Flemish low-risk nulliparous women. Further research is needed to explore healthcare professionals' perspectives on low-risk antenatal care pathways and to examine how different models of antenatal care shape women's decision-making processes and care experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.