Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889761›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2026

Resident resource use in clinical settings: an institutional survey.

Nell Aronoff, Laurel Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nell Aronoffnaronoff@buffalo.edu, Associate Librarian and Liaison to the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University Libraries, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2611-2345
Laurel Muellerdarlingm@buffalo.edu, Medical and Biomedical Sciences Liaison Librarian, University Libraries, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4460-9558

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We explored which point of care (POC) resources medical residents at the University at Buffalo use in clinical settings. We specifically sought to gather feedback from residents who help train medical students to see how they discover, use, and promote resources to support patient care. Case Presentation: We developed an eight question Qualtrics survey. Residency program coordinators emailed the survey to approximately 445 residents in the following programs: Family Medicine, Internal Medicine, Combined Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Neurology, Child Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Psychiatry, Surgery, Plastic Surgery, and Vascular Surgery. The programs we targeted all correspond to required clerkship rotations. The survey was open for two weeks in June 2025. Thirty-nine residents (8.8%) completed our survey. Thirty-five, or nearly 90% of respondents, reported that they frequently use UpToDate, followed by twenty-three (59.0%) that use OpenEvidence, and seventeen that use MDCalc (43.6%). The residents we surveyed were inclined to recommend similar resources to medical students. They most often hear about new resources from other residents and attendings, via announcements on social media or podcasts, or by attending grand rounds and conferences. Conclusions: Our results highlight the continued popularity of UpToDate among medical trainees but also suggest that residents frequently use OpenEvidence in clinical settings. Further studies are needed to determine the impact of artificial intelligence tools on patient care and learning outcomes.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalInternship and ResidencyPoint-of-Care SystemsFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnairesclinical decision makingGraduate medical educationinternship and residencymedical librariesmedical residentsresource usesurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42889761
PMCPMC13670215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.