Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889694›Full record

ArticleRSC advances2026

Characterizing the structure of 3D DNA origami in a transmission electron microscope.

Alyna Ong, Christoph Hadlich, Taekyu Jeong, Darius Pohl, Iman Elbalasy, Ralf Seidel, Michael Mertig, Bernd Rellinghaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alyna OngDresden Center for Nanoanalysis (DCN), cfaed, TUD Dresden University of Technology 01062 Dresden Germany bernd.rellinghaus@tu-dresden.de.
Christoph HadlichPeter-Debye-Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Universität Leipzig 04103 Leipzig Germany.
Taekyu JeongPhysical Chemistry, TUD Dresden University of Technology 01062 Dresden Germany.
Darius PohlDresden Center for Nanoanalysis (DCN), cfaed, TUD Dresden University of Technology 01062 Dresden Germany bernd.rellinghaus@tu-dresden.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-4325
Iman ElbalasyPeter-Debye-Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Universität Leipzig 04103 Leipzig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9317-6360
Ralf SeidelPeter-Debye-Institute for Soft Matter Physics, Universität Leipzig 04103 Leipzig Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6642-053X
Michael MertigPhysical Chemistry, TUD Dresden University of Technology 01062 Dresden Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-0135
Bernd RellinghausDresden Center for Nanoanalysis (DCN), cfaed, TUD Dresden University of Technology 01062 Dresden Germany bernd.rellinghaus@tu-dresden.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-8545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA origami nanostructures provide programmable control over nanoscale geometry but remain challenging to image due to their low atomic number. Here, we systematically evaluate imaging strategies for both stained and unstained DNA origami deposited on carbon-coated TEM grids. Using Weber contrast as a quantitative metric, we compared different operating modes of (scanning) transmission electron microscopy, (S)TEM, in order to find optimum imaging conditions. STEM was consistently found to deliver the highest contrast, with optimal performance at a camera length of 600 mm towards the high angle annular dark field (HAADF) detector. As expected, the contrast was higher for the thicker three-dimensional nanotubes as compared to DNA 6-helix bundles (6HBs) due to the larger projected thickness of the former. The contrast was effectively enhanced by heavy metal staining with uranyl formate. Notably, 3D molds preserved their designated dimensions upon staining and also largely retained their structural integrity upon complexation with palladium, which also improved the visibility of the structures. These results establish STEM as the optimal approach for high-contrast imaging of DNA origami even of unstained samples and provide practical guidelines for sample preparation and imaging conditions that promote reliable structural visualization.

Identifiers

PMID42889694
PMCPMC13669860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.