Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889677›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Combination of Technologies in Body Contouring: Evidence Mapping and a Decision-Making Algorithm.

Igo Reichmann Losso, Luiz Augusto Sousa Oliveira, Camila Araújo Gomes, Nélio Nunes Cabette Filho, Victor da Costa Sacksida Valladão, Ligia Helena Mendes, Nathalí Eureka Bencosme Veras, Joel Abreu Collado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Igo Reichmann LossoPlastic Surgery, Hospital Niterói D'Or, Serviço de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Plástica Prof. Ronaldo Pontes, Niterói, BRA.
Luiz Augusto Sousa OliveiraGeneral Surgery, Fundação Hospitalar Santa Terezinha de Erechim (FHSTE), Erechim, BRA.
Camila Araújo GomesPlastic Surgery, Hospital Niterói D'Or, Serviço de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Plástica Prof. Ronaldo Pontes, Niterói, BRA.
Nélio Nunes Cabette FilhoPlastic Surgery, Hospital Niterói D'Or, Serviço de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Plástica Prof. Ronaldo Pontes, Niterói, BRA.
Victor da Costa Sacksida ValladãoPlastic Surgery, Hospital Niterói D'Or, Serviço de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Plástica Prof. Ronaldo Pontes, Niterói, BRA.
Ligia Helena MendesPlastic Surgery, Hospital Niterói D'Or, Serviço de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Plástica Prof. Ronaldo Pontes, Niterói, BRA.
Nathalí Eureka Bencosme VerasGeneral Surgery, Hospital Niterói D'Or, Serviço de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Plástica Prof. Ronaldo Pontes, Niterói, BRA.
Joel Abreu ColladoPlastic Surgery, Hospital Niterói D'Or, Serviço de Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia Plástica Prof. Ronaldo Pontes, Niterói, BRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body contouring has evolved from a mainly surgical discipline into a multimodal field integrating suction lipectomy, energy-based devices (EBDs), pharmacologic adjuncts, and electromagnetic muscle stimulation. Applying several technologies to the same patient, sequentially or simultaneously, has outpaced the comparative evidence needed to guide their use, leaving surgeons without a structured framework for indication. This narrative review appraises the evidence by tissue target, adipose reduction, cutaneous retraction, and muscle definition, profiles each contemporary technology, and proposes a pragmatic decision-making algorithm anchored in the patient's clinical profile rather than a device hierarchy. Surgical-energy pairings, chiefly radiofrequency-assisted and helium plasma-assisted liposuction, show the most consistent additive skin retraction with acceptable safety. Non-invasive pairings, such as cryolipolysis with high-intensity focused electromagnetic (HIFEM) stimulation and synchronized radiofrequency-HIFEM, produce measurable but modest gains in fat and muscle tone. Pharmacologic adjuncts occupy a narrow niche. Separately, the growing population reshaped by glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, presenting skin redundancy with disproportionate lean-mass loss, is emerging as a distinct candidate in whom excision remains primary and muscle-directed therapy gains a physiological rationale. Heterogeneous outcome metrics, a predominance of industry-sponsored series, and the absence of standardized sequencing protocols remain the principal limitations. Technologies are best paired through complementary tissue targets rather than redundant addition; the proposed algorithm stratifies candidates by adipose excess, cutaneous laxity, muscle tone, and scar tolerance to support a rational, individualized choice among monotherapy, sequential non-invasive strategies, and surgical-plus-EBD approaches.

Indexed as

body contouringcryolipolysiselectric stimulation therapyhigh-intensity focused ultrasound ablationlipectomyradiofrequency therapy

Identifiers

PMID42889677
PMCPMC13670887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.