ArticleOncology reviews2026
Exploring the immune enhancement effect of radiotherapy combined with NK cells on non-small cell lung cancer based on proteomics technology.
Article in Oncology reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although radiotherapy (RT) and natural killer (NK) cell-based therapy have shown promising potential in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the therapeutic efficacy and safety of their combination remain to be fully elucidated. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined RT and NK cell therapy and performed preliminary proteomic profiling to characterize its potential effects on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), providing new insights and a theoretical and clinical basis for the development of NK cell-based therapeutic strategies for NSCLC. Methods: C57BL/6-derived subcutaneous Lewis lung carcinoma models were established to determine the minimal effective dose of both radiotherapy and adoptively transferred natural killer cells. Based on the MED-derived findings, the mice were further randomized into five experimental groups for therapeutic efficacy evaluation: the Control group, the RT group, the NK group, the combination therapy group (RN group), and the repeated combination therapy group (RN2 group). Tumour volume and body weight were monitored longitudinally. Differentially abundant proteins were interrogated by Gene Ontology enrichment and Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses to systematically describe the synergistic antitumor efficacy of differentially expressed proteins. Results: Compared with RT or NK cell-based immunotherapy as monotherapies, the RN group exhibited markedly enhanced tumor growth inhibition, with no overt treatment-related toxicities observed. Following the second cycle of combined therapy, mice in the RN2 group displayed a more pronounced reduction in tumor growth rate with those in the single-cycle combination cohort; notably, no significant adverse events associated with the combined regimen were detected throughout the entire experimental duration. Proteomic profiling unraveled that RT disrupted the core regulatory networks governing intracellular DNA replication and repair processes in tumor cells in a therapy-specific manner, whereas NK cell immunotherapy potently and selectively activated the classical pathway of the host complement system. Conclusion: Collectively, RT and NK cell therapy demonstrate superior synergistic efficacy and no overt toxicity was observed, with repeated treatments further delaying tumor progression. Mechanistically, proteomics shows that RT disrupts DNA replication/repair networks, whereas NK cell therapy was associated with upregulation of multiple complement components, including those belonging to the classical and lectin pathways, suggesting a potential involvement of these pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.