ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2026
Documented pain phenotypes and interventional pain-care exposure in patients with dystonia: a retrospective text-mining cohort study.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pain is a non-motor manifestation of dystonia, but its anatomical heterogeneity and treatment exposure are incompletely characterized. We described pain phenotypes in patients with dystonia referred to a tertiary pain service. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health record text from 2010 to 2026 was collapsed from 108,797 raw rows to 1860 encounters among 129 patients. A Hebrew-English rule-based pipeline identified pain phenotypes and documented treatment exposures. A category-stratified random sample of 129 records was manually audited by a senior neurosurgeon blinded to pipeline output. The primary objective was phenotype distribution; treatment exposures and phenotype-treatment associations were secondary or exploratory. Results: Mean age was 67.0 years (SD 6.0), 61 patients (47.3%) were men, mean age at dystonia onset was 60 years, and all patients had at least four years of documented disease. Phenotype-codable pain was identified in 125 patients (96.9%). The most frequent phenotypes were limb/extremity (72.9%), spine/radicular (72.1%), cervico-occipital (53.5%), neuropathic-descriptor (43.4%), and myofascial/muscle pain (37.2%). At least one prespecified interventional procedure category was documented in 86 patients (66.7%). Cervical dystonia was associated with cervico-occipital pain (69.4% vs 43.8%; OR 2.91, 95% CI 1.38-6.18; Conclusions: Pain in this referral-enriched cohort was anatomically and mechanistically heterogeneous and frequently accompanied by documented procedural and medication exposure. The findings support prospective assessment using validated pain instruments, but do not establish diagnoses, treatment efficacy, or population prevalence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.