ArticleNeuroscience applied2026
Variation in public health reimbursement policies of ECT and rTMS across 28 European countries: A call for evidence-based policy reform from the ECNP Neuromodulation Network.
Article in Neuroscience applied, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental disorders contribute significantly to the disease burden in Europe. Brain stimulation treatments such as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are supported by strong evidence and are recommended in clinical guidelines in many countries. However, access to these interventions remains highly inconsistent across Europe. Reimbursement by public health services plays a critical role in enabling equitable access to these therapies. In this study, we examined disparities in national reimbursement policies for ECT and rTMS for the treatment of mental disorders in both inpatient and outpatient settings across 28 European countries, leveraging information from public databases and expertise from a multinational expert group within the ECNP Neuromodulation Network. Our results show that ECT is reimbursed for inpatient care in all 28 studied countries, while outpatient ECT is reimbursed in 15 of 28 countries (53.6%), with a geographic trend toward higher availability in Scandinavian and Western European countries. rTMS reimbursement was reported in 15 of 28 countries (53.6%) for inpatient care and in 8 of 28 countries (28.6%) for outpatient care, with no consistent geographic pattern. Subsequent analyses examining reimbursement policies in relation to the national Human Development Index (HDI), the Gini coefficient, and healthcare infrastructure metrics revealed no statistically significant differences between countries that do and do not reimburse outpatient ECT. Although countries reimbursing outpatient ECT showed numerically fewer hospital beds and slightly higher HDI values, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, no significant associations were observed between rTMS reimbursement and indicators of socioeconomic development, income inequality, or healthcare infrastructure. These findings highlight a striking disparity in national reimbursement policies across Europe, despite the solid evidence base for ECT and rTMS in treating mental health disorders. The current landscape suggests that many patients in Europe experience limited access to these effective treatments that could alleviate individual suffering and reduce societal disease burden. We call for urgent policy action to align health system reimbursement with clinical evidence for treatment efficacy and to improve access to evidence-based brain stimulation therapies across Europe.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.