ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2026
Successful superior vena cava isolation using point-by-point cryothermal ablation after failed radiofrequency ablation.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), but non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers such as the superior vena cava (SVC) also play an important role. Electrical isolation of the SVC (SVCI) can be limited by anatomical complexity and the risk of phrenic nerve or sinus node injury, particularly with radiofrequency or cryoballoon techniques. We report a 76-year-old woman with recurrent paroxysmal AF after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. During repeat ablation, AF was initially induced from the left atrial posterior wall and successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation. Subsequent provocation revealed AF triggers from the SVC. Despite careful radiofrequency ablation under phrenic nerve pacing, complete SVCI could not be achieved. Point-by-point cryothermal ablation was then performed under continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, resulting in successful SVCI without complications. This case suggests that focal cryothermal ablation may be a practical and safer alternative when SVCI cannot be achieved with radiofrequency energy. Learning objective: To understand that superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) may be challenging with radiofrequency ablation due to anatomical complexity and safety limitations related to phrenic nerve injury. This case highlights point-by-point cryothermal ablation as a feasible alternative strategy, enabling stable catheter contact, precise lesion delivery, and continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, particularly in regions where point-by-point pulsed-field ablation is not yet available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.