Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889600›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2026

Successful superior vena cava isolation using point-by-point cryothermal ablation after failed radiofrequency ablation.

Shimpei Seiki, Takeshi Matsuura, Satoshi Yamamoto

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shimpei SeikiDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Tsukumodai 1-1-6, Suita City, Osaka, Japan.
Takeshi MatsuuraDepartment of Cardiology, Itami City Hospital, T 100 Konyoiike, Itami, Hyogo, Japan.
Satoshi YamamotoDepartment of Cardiology, Itami City Hospital, T 100 Konyoiike, Itami, Hyogo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), but non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers such as the superior vena cava (SVC) also play an important role. Electrical isolation of the SVC (SVCI) can be limited by anatomical complexity and the risk of phrenic nerve or sinus node injury, particularly with radiofrequency or cryoballoon techniques. We report a 76-year-old woman with recurrent paroxysmal AF after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. During repeat ablation, AF was initially induced from the left atrial posterior wall and successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation. Subsequent provocation revealed AF triggers from the SVC. Despite careful radiofrequency ablation under phrenic nerve pacing, complete SVCI could not be achieved. Point-by-point cryothermal ablation was then performed under continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, resulting in successful SVCI without complications. This case suggests that focal cryothermal ablation may be a practical and safer alternative when SVCI cannot be achieved with radiofrequency energy. Learning objective: To understand that superior vena cava isolation (SVCI) may be challenging with radiofrequency ablation due to anatomical complexity and safety limitations related to phrenic nerve injury. This case highlights point-by-point cryothermal ablation as a feasible alternative strategy, enabling stable catheter contact, precise lesion delivery, and continuous phrenic nerve monitoring, particularly in regions where point-by-point pulsed-field ablation is not yet available.

Indexed as

Atrial fibrillationCase reportCryothermal ablationPhrenic nerveSuperior vena cava isolation

Identifiers

PMID42889600
PMCPMC13670385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.