ReviewIranian journal of basic medical sciences2026
Nose-to-brain drug delivery: A new frontier in targeted therapeutics.
Review in Iranian journal of basic medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delivering therapeutics to the Central Nervous System (CNS) remains a major challenge in drug development, largely because the blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits brain exposure for most systemically administered agents. Among alternative delivery routes, intranasal administration has attracted significant interest because it leverages direct anatomical connections between the nasal cavity and the brain, thereby reducing reliance on BBB permeability. This review examines the nasal route, focusing on how olfactory and trigeminal neural pathways contribute to drug transport into the CNS. Rather than assuming a single dominant route, the relative roles of extracellular perineural diffusion, intracellular neuronal transport, perivascular movement, and cerebrospinal fluid-associated distribution are evaluated in light of existing experimental evidence. Key factors that limit or enhance intranasal brain delivery-including mucociliary clearance, local enzymatic activity, drug physicochemical properties, formulation design, and patient-specific variability-are discussed with attention to their practical implications. Recent advances in formulations, such as mucoadhesive and in situ gelling systems, particulate and lipid-based carriers, dendrimers, and stimuli-responsive platforms, are reviewed alongside developments in nasal delivery devices that influence regional deposition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.