Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889538›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2026

Health sciences librarians' awareness and incorporation of informed consent standards for medical image publication: a preliminary study.

Sarah McClung, Rachel Keiko Stark, Megan DeArmond, Sherli Koshy-Chenthittayil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah McClungsmcclung@ucdavis.edu, Head of Collection Strategies, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-007X
Rachel Keiko Starkstark@csus.edu, Health Sciences Librarian, Sacramento State University, Sacramento, CA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7946-2213
Megan DeArmondmde_armo@touro.edu, Associate Professor and Systematic Review Services Librarian, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7048-1039
Sherli Koshy-Chenthittayilskoshy-c@touro.edu, Data Analyst, Touro University Nevada, Henderson, NV.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-455X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if health sciences library workers were aware of informed consent best practices and standards for the publication of medical images and if they incorporated the recommendations into their professional work. Methods: A survey was developed by the authors to determine awareness and incorporation of informed consent best practices and standards for the publication of medical images. The survey was distributed via listservs of professional librarian associations in the United States. The results of the survey were tabulated in RStudio. Fisher's Exact Test was carried out to determine if awareness of informed consent influenced job responsibilities. Results: A total of 91 respondents were included in the data analysis with all respondents reporting multiple responsibilities (instructional, collections, and/or digital initiatives). While the majority of library workers (59%) were aware of the best practices and standards, few (6.6%) incorporated the recommendations into their professional work. Over 50% of librarians with instructional responsibilities, over 70% of librarians with collections responsibilities, and over 60% of librarians with digital initiative responsibilities were aware of the recommendations but did not incorporate the recommendations into their job duties. Conclusions: The professional work of health sciences library workers does not appear to include a significant incorporation of informed consent best practices and standards for the publication of medical images. There is a need for future research to better understand how library workers can better incorporate their knowledge of informed consent recommendations into their work.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingInformed ConsentLibrariansLibraries, MedicalHumansProfessional RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesConsenthealth sciences librariansimagespublication

Identifiers

PMID42889538
PMCPMC13670234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.