ReviewFrontiers in genetics2026
From inherited susceptibility to tumor state: toward a stage-aware architecture for genomic risk stratification in prostate cancer.
Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer risk is currently represented by two largely separate genomic layers. Germline polygenic scores estimate inherited susceptibility before diagnosis, whereas tumor genomic and transcriptomic classifiers estimate biological aggressiveness and treatment response after tissue acquisition. Artificial intelligence can connect these layers, but simply concatenating high-dimensional features is unlikely to produce transportable clinical tools. This Mini Review examines how biologically informed machine learning, single-cell and spatial atlases, whole-omics response models, and validated tissue classifiers are reshaping prostate cancer risk stratification. We argue that the most useful architecture is a stage-aware system: ancestry-calibrated germline risk first modifies screening intensity; tissue or liquid-biopsy models then resolve tumor state; and longitudinal molecular measurements update risk under treatment. Evidence is strongest for polygenic enrichment of screening populations and for locked transcriptomic classifiers tested in randomized-trial cohorts. By contrast, many multi-omics models remain retrospective, dataset-dependent, and weakly calibrated across ancestry, disease stage, and specimen type. Progress requires explicit clinical decision points, external and prospective validation, uncertainty reporting, ancestry-aware calibration, and comparisons against simpler clinicopathological models. A unified framework should therefore treat artificial intelligence not as a single prognostic score, but as an auditable sequence of genomic updates that links inherited susceptibility to evolving tumor biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.