Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889498›Full record

ReviewAnesthesiology research and practice2026

Can Pillow Use Prevent Postdural Puncture Headache? A Critical Review.

Aragaw Hamza Yimer, Ahmed Muhye Seid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anesthesiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aragaw Hamza YimerDepartment of Anesthesia College of Medicine and Health Sciences Dire Dawa University Dire Dawa Ethiopia ddu.edu.et.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7200-5367
Ahmed Muhye SeidDepartment of Public Health College of Medicine and Health Sciences Dire Dawa University Dire Dawa Ethiopia ddu.edu.et.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-5239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a recognized complication of neuraxial anesthesia that follows unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during spinal anesthesia and other neuraxial procedures. It has traditionally been managed with a period of mandatory supine bed rest and pillow restriction, a practice grounded in the historical belief that recumbency limits ongoing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, thereby preventing headaches. This "no-pillow" instruction remains widely taught and practiced, including among clinicians, despite an absence of literature support and evidence suggesting the opposite may be true. This review synthesizes the current literature, including randomized controlled trials, Cochrane systematic reviews, and multisociety clinical guidance, to critically examine whether pillow restriction after dural puncture reduces PDPH incidence. Evidence indicates that neither prolonged bed rest nor pillow avoidance reduces PDPH incidence and that enforced postural restriction instead increases patient discomfort, back and neck pain, and the risk of complications associated with prolonged immobilization. This review advocates the revision of institutional protocols to permit pillow use and early postoperative mobilization, as tolerated.

Identifiers

PMID42889498
PMCPMC13669653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.