ArticleJournal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine2026
Trends in stellate ganglion block for orofacial pain: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stellate ganglion block (SGB) has been applied to a diverse range of orofacial pain conditions, yet no bibliometric analysis has been conducted in this field. In this study, we aimed to characterize the global research trends, geographic distribution, and thematic evolution of the literature on SGB for orofacial pain. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using the Scopus database with no restrictions on publication date or language. Publications addressing SGB as the primary intervention for orofacial pain were eligible. Bibliometric indicators included the compound annual growth rate (CAGR), author productivity (Lotka's Law), journal scattering (Bradford's Law), and citation impact (h-index and g-index). Keyword co-occurrence network analysis was performed using the VOSviewer software; a minimum occurrence threshold of five was applied, and overlay visualization was used to map the average publication year of each keyword. Results: Ninety-one publications spanning 55 years (1971-2025) were included. Annual publication output increased 3.7-fold from the initial period (mean 0.9/year, 1971-1999) to the recent period (mean 3.3/year, 2013-2025; overall CAGR: 2.1%). Japan was the leading contributor (n = 31, 34.1%), followed by the United States (n = 18, 19.8%). The corpus received 1,630 citations (h-index: 22; g-index: 38); case reports were the most frequent document type (40.6%). Keyword co-occurrence network analysis identified 54 keywords organized into four clusters, with a temporal gradient from the oldest (herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia [PHN]; mean publication year: 2007.8) to the most recent (pharmacotherapy and central sensitization; 2013.4). Within their respective clusters, tooth extraction (2015.2) and orofacial pain (2015.4) showed the most recent average publication years among keywords that directly co-occurred with "stellate ganglion block"; tooth extraction was associated with neuropathic pain, allodynia, and central sensitization-related keywords. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis identified a shift in research focus from herpes zoster and PHN toward central sensitization mechanisms and contemporary pharmacotherapy, with post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (PTTNeuP) emerging as a modern indication for SGB. These findings highlight the need for prospective clinical studies evaluating the efficacy of SGB for PTTNeuP cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.