ArticleNutrition research and practice2026
Comparability of food frequency questionnaires between Korean Children's Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS) and Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) in pregnant women.
Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe Korean Children's Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS) developed a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess maternal dietary intake during pregnancy. This FFQ shares high structural similarity with the validated FFQ of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES), a representative dietary assessment tool for the Korean adult population, which includes 97 of the 112 items in the Ko-CHENS FFQ. The comparability of the Ko-CHENS and KoGES FFQs among pregnant women was evaluated. SUBJECTS/
methodsNinety-four women recruited from Kangwon National University Hospital between December 2024 and February 2025 were included. The participants consecutively completed the Ko-CHENS and KoGES FFQs. The nutrient intakes were adjusted for the total energy intake using the residual method. Log-transformed intakes of energy, nutrients, and food groups were compared using the correlation coefficients, cross-classification percent agreement, weighted kappa statistics, and Bland-Altman plots.
resultsThe Ko-CHENS FFQ yielded higher absolute intake estimates for energy and the majority of nutrients and food groups than the KoGES FFQ. The Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients ranged from 0.34 (vitamin E) to 0.68 (β-carotene) for energy and nutrients and from 0.15 (sugars and jams) to 0.77 (salted vegetables) for food groups, with median values of 0.55 and 0.61, respectively. The median proportions of the participants classified into the same or adjacent quartiles were 96.39% for energy and nutrients and 96.52% for food groups. The weighted kappa statistics ranged from 0.23 to 0.52 for energy and nutrients and from 0.06 to 0.59 for food groups, with median values of 0.38 and 0.45, respectively. The Bland-Altman plots for energy and macronutrients showed that the data points were primarily within the limits of agreement.
conclusionThe Ko-CHENS and KoGES FFQs showed fair-to-moderate comparability, suggesting that the Ko-CHENS FFQ can be used for ranking Korean pregnant women based on their dietary intake levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.