Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42889433›Full record

ArticleNutrition research and practice2026

Protective effects of

Yunjung Lee, Jiyoung Hwang, Tae-Rahk Kim, Minn Sohn, Eunju Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yunjung LeeDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4726-4671
Jiyoung HwangDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-2744
Tae-Rahk KimLactomason Co., Ltd., Jinju 52840, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8066-1161
Minn SohnLactomason Co., Ltd., Jinju 52840, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6278-1795
Eunju ParkDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kyungnam University, Changwon 51767, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3462-6090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesThis study examined the neuroprotective effects of MATERIALS/

methodsLM1060 (1 × 10

resultsLM1060 showed a protective effect against scopolamine-induced cognitive dysfunction, as confirmed by behavioral tests including the Y-maze and novel object recognition tests. Oral administration of LM1060 restored the ACh and ChAT activity reduced by scopolamine. The β-secretase activity and β-amyloid levels decreased after the LM1060 and DO treatment. The LM1060 administration group exhibited a higher protective effect against scopolamine-induced DNA damage in brain tissue than the scopolamine-treated group. In vitro studies showed that LM1060 significantly enhanced the cell viability and antioxidant capacity, reduced LDH release and AChE activity, and modulated inflammatory cytokine gene expression by downregulating interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6 and upregulating IL-10.

conclusion

Indexed as

inflammationLactobacillus acidophilusmemory disordersneuroprotective agentsscopolamine

Identifiers

PMID42889433
PMCPMC13669480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.