ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Electrohydrodynamic jet printing of gelatin-GPTMS-PEO hybrid biomaterial inks for high-resolution fibre patterning.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrohydrodynamic jet printing (EHD jet printing) enables high-resolution direct writing of fibrous biomaterial architectures, which are of interest for future biointerface, scaffold-mimetic, and sensing-oriented platforms. Yet EHD jet printing of aqueous gelatin systems remains challenging because of temperature-dependent viscosity increase, capillary instability, and narrow cone-jet stability windows. Here, we adapt an aqueous gelatin-GPTMS-PEO hybrid biomaterial ink for near-field EHD jet printing using acetic acid as a process-modifying additive. Acidification improved precursor clarity and extended the low-viscosity processing window during cooling, the printable formulation had an apparent viscosity of 49.6 mPa
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.