ArticleInternational journal of pediatrics2026
Mechanical Ventilation and Survival Without Major Morbidity in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Multicenter Study.
Article in International journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a frequent lifesaving therapy in very low birthweight (VLBW) infants, although it poses risks and may present complications. Objective: To evaluate the association between the use and duration of MV and survival without major morbidity (SWMM) in VLBW infants according to gestational age (GA). Methods: Multicenter retrospective study of prospectively collected data of premature infants weighing 500-1500 g and 24-30 weeks of GA, born between 2010 and 2019 at NEOCOSUR Neonatal Network centers. Baseline characteristics and neonatal outcomes were compared between ventilated and nonventilated VLBW infants. Stratification for each week of GA was performed. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for main outcomes by logistic regression, adjusted for birthweight, GA, sex, mode of delivery, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), antenatal corticosteroids, small for gestational age (SGA), and Apgar scores. Infants with congenital anomalies and those who died before discharge were excluded. Results: A total of 7040 infants were included in the analysis. Among these, 4993 (70.9%) were ventilated and 2047 (29.1%) were not. Nonventilated infants were larger, healthier at birth, and presented fewer major adverse outcomes ( Conclusions: The use and duration of MV were associated with a significant decrease in SWMM in this population of VLBW infants, despite risk adjustment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.