Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
From community diagnosis to policy dialogue: co-creating childhood obesity prevention strategies in rural and urban Portugal.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Promoting healthy lifestyles from early childhood is central to balanced development and the prevention of health problems throughout life. The European HEALTH4EUKids project examines a participatory process of community diagnosis, co-creation into local policies for child health promotion and childhood obesity prevention in two Portuguese territories with distinct rural and urban profiles. Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted within a mixed-methods action-research framework. The study provides an exploratory assessment of children's wellbeing indicators and contextual differences, without permitting causal inference. Participants included 202 primary-school pupils (mean age = 7.43 ± 1.14 years) and 54 community adults (mean age = 48.76 ± 11.51 years), alongside stakeholders from health, community, and local decision-making sectors. Data included a questionnaire adapted from the 2022 Health Behavior in School-aged Children (HBSC) protocol, KIDSCREEN-10, the Living Healthy Tool (LHT) which was translated and culturally adapted for the Portuguese context, satisfaction questionnaires and focus groups. LHT-student version was administered exclusively in Alter do Chão. Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed using SPSS v.28.0 and thematic analysis supported by MAXQDA. Results: Descriptive analyses indicated that 57% of pupils reported irritability or bad mood and 46.7% reported nervousness, while quality of life and sleep were generally favorably rated. Regarding nutritional status, 66% had age-adjusted BMI within the reference range, whereas 36% reported not engaging in regular physical activity. Frequent screen use and exposure to violence during leisure time were also identified as concerns. Community LHT responses indicated differences between municipalities in perceptions of school meals, safety, and access to public services. Focus groups highlighted priorities concerning physical activity, school food environments, and coordination between schools, families, and the community. Conclusions: The findings indicate context-specific strengths and areas for further attention in child health and wellbeing. Quality of life, sleep patterns, and certain family health practices were generally favorable. Conversely, challenges were identified regarding physical activity, screen time, and psychological symptoms, as well as less favorable assessments of school meal quality, community safety, access to services, and opportunities for active leisure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.