ArticleCrime science2026
How crime data incompleteness shapes ethnic disparities in predictive policing: evidence from Chicago.
Article in Crime science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Fairness in Predictive Policing (PP) has been explored by many researchers. However, to the best of our knowledge, no work has quantified the impact of event-level data incompleteness in spatio-temporal prediction on each ethnicity. In this paper, we propose a model to quantify the impact of recorded crime data incompleteness on ethnic disparities in policing. We also examine whether these disparities depend on where in the city data are missing. Methods: We introduce a neighbourhood-level method that allocates PP prediction errors (false positives as potential over-policing, false negatives as potential under-policing) to ethnic groups in proportion to their share of the neighbourhood population. Using Chicago crime records (2022-2024), census data, and HAGEN (a state-of-the-art spatial-temporal PP model), we explore data incompleteness by reducing the original crime data at varying ratios in two settings: (i) 25-100% reductions in neighbourhoods with low racial diversity; (ii) 50% or 100% reductions in communities dominated by a single ethnicity (Hispanic, Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic White, or Non-Hispanic Asian). Enforcement bias outcomes are then compared across ethnicities and scenarios. Results: Removing records from a single-ethnicity-majority community generally reduces predicted over-policing and increases predicted under-policing for that ethnicity across the whole study area, with Asian-majority scenarios a consistent exception. In low-diversity neighbourhoods, greater missingness amplifies prediction bias against Non-Hispanic Black residents specifically: predicted over-policing falls and predicted under-policing rises, with the opposite holding for other groups. The largest overall shifts occur when data are removed from Black-majority communities. Conclusions: Incomplete crime records could propagate into substantial, ethnically unequal disparities in model-predicted policing exposure, whose direction depends on where missingness concentrates. The findings motivate auditing missingness and its demographic distribution as a prerequisite for deploying event-level PP systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.