Observational studyFrontiers in neurology2026
Development of a machine learning-based multicenter study for predicting severe intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants using perinatal variables.
Observational study in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To develop and validate machine learning models for predicting severe intraventricular hemorrhage (SIVH) in preterm infants using only prenatal and intrapartum variables, and to identify the optimal model. Method: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included preterm infants (gestational age ≤34 weeks) who required noninvasive or invasive respiratory support, using data from the Jiangsu Neonatal Respiratory Failure Collaborative Network (2019-2021). Data were split 7:3 into training and validation sets. Eight machine learning algorithms were compared. Performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. An independent cohort served for temporal validation. Results: Among 3,320 infants, the incidence of SIVH was 6.66%. Six predictors were identified: gestational age, birth weight, endotracheal intubation in the delivery room, chest compressions in the delivery room, surfactant administration in the delivery room, and chorioamnionitis. In the training set, logistic regression achieved the highest mean AUC based on 10-fold cross-validation. Bootstrap internal validation of the LR model yielded a corrected AUC of 0.809. In the independent hold-out validation set, the LR model again demonstrated the best discriminative ability among the eight algorithms (AUC: 0.804), with satisfactory calibration and favorable net benefit. Sensitivity analyses showed that the LR model maintained robust performance in temporal validation using an independent cohort (AUC: 0.822) and across geographic subgroups (AUC range: 0.729-0.885). An online interactive tool was also developed to facilitate clinical application. Interpretation: A LR model using six readily available perinatal variables provides good discrimination and calibration for predicting SIVH in preterm infants, enabling immediate risk stratification at birth for SIVH occurring during the neonatal hospitalization period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.