ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2026
MEMOIR-VLM-a multimodal vision-language model for Alzheimer's disease classification and question answering.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects an estimated 55 million people worldwide and is projected to nearly double by 2050, creating a need for scalable, non-invasive AI systems that can classify disease stage, support multimodal clinical reasoning, and interact in natural language. Most deep learning work on AD focuses on single-modality classification without natural-language interaction and typically assumes complete input data. Methods: We present MEMOIR-VLM (Multimodal Encoder with Missing-modality and Open-ended Inference for Retrieval), a modular two-stage vision-language framework trained and evaluated on 2,363 ADNI subjects. The first stage is a missing-modality-aware encoder that fuses T1-weighted MRI and DTI fractional anisotropy maps with structured clinical scores via cross-attention fusion with stochastic modality dropout, allowing a single set of weights to operate on any of the seven non-empty modality subsets without imputation. After CLIP/InfoNCE contrastive pretraining, the encoder is fine-tuned for multi-task prediction of 3-way diagnosis, binary diagnosis, CDR-SB, age, and sex. The second stage extends the frozen encoder into a retrieval-augmented generation pipeline for case-based reasoning and open-ended visual question answering. Results: On held-out ADNI test data, with CDR-SB excluded from the inputs to remove a cognitive-score leak, the encoder achieved 91.3% balanced accuracy for CN vs. dementia and 68.2% balanced accuracy for 3-class diagnosis (macro-F1 = 0.681); age was predicted with a 5.96-year MAE. When the diagnosis field was withheld from retrieved captions, no evaluated LLM exceeded a retrieval-only k-NN majority vote (0.673), which itself closely matched the encoder's 3-class accuracy (0.682). The RAG-VQA layer showed strong text fidelity (BERTScore = 0.894; SBERT cosine similarity = 0.811). Zero-shot external validation on OASIS-3 (1,048 subjects, no diffusion data) retained 78.7% balanced accuracy for CN vs. impaired (AUC = 0.889) using identical ADNI-trained weights with the DTI branch masked. Discussion: MEMOIR-VLM combines missing-modality-aware multimodal encoding, multi-task clinical prediction, and retrieval-grounded natural-language reasoning within a single modular framework. The results support using the encoder, optionally with k-NN voting, as the diagnostic component and the RAG-VQA layer as an interpretable natural-language interface that surfaces comparable cases and readable clinical summaries. The external validation results further demonstrate the practical value of the missing-modality mechanism when an imaging modality is unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.