ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Development of the literacy scale for excellent traditional Chinese culture among college students.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Literacy scale for Excellent Traditional Chinese Culture (ETCC-LS) is an important measurement instrument for assessing college students' cultural accomplishment and the effectiveness of university cultural education. Nevertheless, existing measurement tools show limited contextual suitability for Chinese college students. Based on the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) framework, this study aimed to develop the ETCC-LS for the assessment of excellent traditional Chinese culture literacy among college students. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design with convenience sampling, an item pool was generated through literature review and expert consultation, then administered to college students across six universities in Fujian Province, China. Of 1,424 questionnaires distributed, 1,345 valid responses were retained and screened via item analysis before being randomly split into an exploratory subsample ( Results: The final ETCC-LS consisted of 11 items covering three dimensions: knowledge of traditional culture, attitude toward cultural openness, practice of cultural dissemination. The respecified three-factor model yielded acceptable fit: Conclusion: The KAP-based ETCC-LS showed acceptable reliability and validity. It serves as a reliable measurement tool for assessing college students' literacy of excellent traditional Chinese culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.